candid thoughts on the issues of the day.
What we need to get anywhere fast
Published on February 11, 2004 By Robert Guinness In Pure Technology
I just read an article from the International Herald Tribune (which I actually read
on commondreams.org)
, which states that the first flag on Mars, should not be the American Flag, but the "flag of Planet Earth"

I would like to respond to this with a sobering fact:
There is no "flag of Planet Earth." I'm not saying there shouldn't be, but
the fact is, there isn't.

Sure, there is the United Nations flag, but this hardly represents a
unified planet. Yes, we could easily design a "flag of Planet Earth," but
the point is, we need to unify Earth *before* it makes sense to have an
Earth symbol, such as the "flag of Planet Earth".

The U.S. President or any countries' leader cannot effectively, or even
reasonably, announce a world space effort because the institutions and
structures necessary to carry such an effort out do not exist. The
cooperative system used on ISS, although it forged great advances in
international cooperation, still stands out as a sad example of the thorns
that still exist in the garden of transnationalism.

We need to work towards a truly global structure in order to effectively
deal with global issues, such as the environment, labor standards, and
human rights--and to attempt global efforts, such as erradicating poverty,
erradicating major world diseases, and, most notably, interplanetary
travel. We need a global constitution, global bill of rights, global
security forces, and global tax codes for a global economy.

The daily news shows that we are a long way from the day when these
necessities are a likely reality. But we must keep them in sight. Without them,
we are essentially a global anarchy. Local warlords keep peace in various regions,
but there is no overall structure.

I'm afraid the reality of humans on Mars is also a long ways off, but this
goal too is one we should keep going after. A logical next step is an
international mission to the Moon. But where is the International Space
Agency?

-rob

P.S. In fact, there is a guy in Nebraska (or somewhere in the mid-west)
that started up an "International Space Agency," but such an endeavour
unfortunately can't easily be started by some guy in Nebraska. We need
leaders from around the world to commit to such a goal.
Comments
on Feb 11, 2004
Screw that. America would own the planet but for those morons, so they least we can do is claim another one.



~Dan
on Feb 15, 2004
If the previous commenter reads this, please clarify your position. Are you suggesting that the United States should own the planet? I am confused.

Robert is correct in stating that we must unify the planet before there can be any planet earth flag. I see why it is vital to explore space as a unified planet. If we want to search for new life and discover new worlds outside of our borders, we should have the backing of everyone within those borders.

I want to comment specifically on one thing that Rob said. I agree with him when discourages any leader from laying claim to a world effort led solely by one country. I would like to point out the U.S. tendency in other "arenas" to claim world participation, namely in sports. We have the "World Series," the "World Wrestling Federation" (now World Wrestling Entertainment), and just about every other sport in this country has a "World Championship". I hardly see the world represented in these events.

Maybe because the U.S. sees itself as the leader of the free world, it thinks it can speak for the world. I have never heard of any other country make such claims, but if anyone has, please inform me. With that said, I agree that in order to have international participation in space exploration, no one country should assume leadership. But, human pride in ourselves, and therefore inherently in our countries, must give way to pride in our planet. That is a long way from happening, but whenever I think of that possiblity I am reminded of an episode of Star Trek: The Next Genreation, where Captain Riker says to a guest of the Enterprise (paraphrase) that they do not do their job for money, but for the good of man. Unfortunately such ideas are seen as communist, and therefore evil. I don't understand how such a notion could be evil.
on Feb 16, 2004
Hmm just make it so any country paying more than 5% of costs gets a free flag planted on mars as fringe benefits?
on Feb 16, 2004
It's not communist to do jobs for the good of man; doing so is altruistic or simply noble - sometimes it's even saintly. Doing things in homage of the collective is what is communist. The "collective" and the "good of man" have a long history of animosity that's as old as the fight between individualism and the common good, or in Disney terms, cats and dogs.

I agree with Rob on this one, there's no united earth (as inspiring as such a community would be) and the US is the closest thing to a world order, even though the vast majority of Americans and other global peoples desperately wish it were not so. I think a misson to Mars, led by the US, would do better things in the early 21st century than a UN mission. In typical American parlance, it'd be like saying, "hey world, look! we can do more than blow the fuck out of you!"
on Mar 16, 2004
>a sobering fact:
>There is no "flag of Planet Earth."
An internet fact : http://flagofplanetearth.est-ici.org
on May 22, 2004
I am the guy?!? in Nebraska.

That is I am Mr. Rick R. Dobson, Jr. the Founder and present CEO of the International Space Agency, I.S.A., International Space Administration.

The International Space Agency Organization founded in 1986 and incorporated in 1990 is an International Organization and Effort.

http://www.international-space-agency.org
http://www.international-space-agency.net
on May 22, 2004
Greetings from the International Space Agency.

http://www.international-space-agency.org

http://www.international-space-agency.net
on Jun 09, 2004
Those pictures are even worse edits than Sir Peter Maxwell's.